Follow the power changes that matter to your projects
A paid four-week research pilot for equipment suppliers and engineering consultants tracking US data-center power. Choose a small watchlist; receive source-linked changes and their practical meaning.
Bring the projects you already care about. BTW will establish a dated baseline, check the agreed public sources and explain material changes in permits, documented equipment and project milestones.
Start with up to five projects over four weeks. Coverage and a fixed fee are agreed before work begins. Requesting a scope review is free and nonbinding.
When a project headline leaves a working question
A new MW figure can describe a campus plan, a permitted turbine cohort or an operating claim. A later amendment can change equipment counts without changing the marketing name. For a supplier or consultant, the useful question is what changed in the projects already on your list and what the evidence supports.
The pilot gives a small team a repeatable research record: a baseline to work from, dated changes to assess and original documents to inspect. It can support territory planning, equipment research or a client briefing. A permit is not proof that procurement is open.
What the four-week pilot includes
| Deliverable | Agreed starting scope |
|---|---|
| Watchlist | Up to five mutually agreed US data-center power projects, with legal entity, location and phase matched. |
| Initial baseline | Documented equipment, permit milestones, source dates, evidence basis and open questions. |
| Four weekly memos | Checks of the agreed sources; material changes, evidence links, interpretation and remaining uncertainty. If no material change is found, the memo states that. |
| Review at the end | Which findings were useful, what remained inaccessible and whether a different watchlist or cadence would help. |
| Fee | A fixed-fee quote after scope and source-access review. No charge, contract or automatic renewal is created by this form. |
The agreed scope defines which sources and fields are checked. This is a scheduled research service; it does not promise continuous surveillance or immediate alerts. Access restrictions and unknowns are disclosed before accepting a watchlist.
From a source record to a usable memo
- Agree the question. Identify your projects and the decision you want to support. Check whether the source coverage can answer it.
- Set the baseline. Keep planned, permitted, reported, observed and operating claims separate. Record the source and date for each.
- Explain the change. Show the earlier and later record, why the distinction matters, what is still unknown and what to verify next.
- Evaluate the pilot. Review the usefulness and effort before agreeing any further work.
The Abilene sample shows the format using TCEQ 177263 and O4721. Its January 2025 turbine cohort totals 360.5 site-rated MW. The sample explains why that is different from a current delivered-power measurement.
Questions before starting
Can you follow my specific projects?
Submit the names, locations or states you need. We will check public-record availability and explain the proposed coverage before quoting. The open database is a small documented sample, not a complete US project census.
What stays free?
Published facility dossiers, the open data and ordinary API access remain free. The pilot pays for a selected watchlist, agreed research checks and interpretation prepared for your question.
What if a source is unavailable or no change is found?
The memo records the checks, access limits and unknowns. No-change findings and unavailable sources are stated explicitly. A missing update is not treated as evidence that construction or operation stopped.
Does this provide engineering or legal sign-off?
The output is a source-linked research memo. Engineering design, legal compliance, procurement commitments and investment decisions require the relevant specialist assessment. Current operating output is only stated when supporting evidence exists.
Who handles the work and the inquiry?
Yaro Korets maintains BTW and reviews pilot scope. Automated checks can assist research; the memo makes its evidence and review scope visible. Your inquiry goes to the private owner inbox for review and reply, without newsletter enrollment.
Request a scoped pilot
Tell Yaro which projects you follow and the decision the research needs to support. We will review source coverage and agree the work and fixed fee before the pilot starts.
Sending this form creates a nonbinding inquiry. It does not charge you, start a contract or subscribe you to the newsletter.
Prefer email? Contact Yaro about a pilot.